View Single Post
Old 06-16-2005, 10:46 PM   #25
raublekick
Moderator
 
raublekick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lancastuh, PA
Posts: 1,678
raublekick is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to raublekick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike
If we're going to relatavise everything and say that "what we think is right and wrong may not be right or wrong" then we cannot have this discussion ... because we're talking about the courts. If there is no right and wrong, no truth, and no justice, then we cannot have a court system that judges people. That court system is dictated by ideology and public opinion.
Well, obvioulsy the court system isn't as black and white as it can be. How many people really think that MJ is innocent? Not many. But how many people think the people who are testifying are really truthful? Not many. So in this case there was no truth, no justice, only right and wrong. But the court had its hands tied just like in many other cases. Based on the evidence the courts made the right decision, but it certainly wasn't right or wrong.

My gripe is that the major public opinion is "Michael Jackson is a weirdo, so he just has to be guilty." This is what I dislike about much of this countries systems. A public opinion != the right opinion.
__________________
http://www.good-evil.net
slap that bitch, sell her coke
raublekick is offline   Reply With Quote